Skip to main content
FlowOps Energy
Advisory-embedded model

Integrated Resource & System Planning Platform

Builds least-cost capacity expansion pathways across generation, storage and demand-side resources, then reports them in the three forms a planning decision actually travels in: an executive summary, a policy brief and the underlying workbook.

What it looks like

IRP/ISP Platform — scenario run
Run · versionedScenario nameHorizon
Capacity expansion by technology and year
ExportExecutive summary
ExportPolicy brief
ExportFull workbook
Every figure traces to this run
Schematic layout — the tool's real structure and outputs, drawn rather than screenshotted so no client data appears. Bars and blocks are placeholders, never figures.

Decision supported

Which resources to build, in what order, and whether a stated target is deliverable by the system that has to carry it.

Intended user

Utilities, TSOs and DSOs, ministries and regulators, and donor programmes commissioning long-term planning studies.

Inputs

  • Historical and projected demand
  • Existing generation fleet with technical and cost parameters
  • Fuel and carbon price trajectories
  • Network constraints or connection queue at whatever resolution exists
  • Policy targets and reliability standards the plan must satisfy

Outputs

  • Least-cost expansion pathway by technology and year
  • Scenario comparison under demand, fuel-price and policy uncertainty
  • Resource adequacy assessment against the applicable standard
  • Executive summary, policy brief and full workbook from the same run

Methodology summary

Scenario-based capacity expansion. Each run is named and versioned, and every published figure traces back to a specific run rather than to a spreadsheet someone edited afterwards — which is what makes a result defensible in front of a regulator months later.

Limitations

  • Results are only as good as the network representation supplied; where a connection queue does not exist in usable form, grid constraints are approximated and the assumption is stated.
  • Least-cost optimisation reflects the costs and constraints entered. It does not price political feasibility, procurement capacity or institutional readiness — those are assessed separately and deliberately outside the model.
  • Not a real-time operations or dispatch tool. It answers investment-horizon questions, not what to run tomorrow.

Screenshots

Integrated Resource & System Planning Platform — interface rendering showing the executive dashboard with a demo dataset.
Interface rendering — the tool's real screens and outputs, produced as a design rather than captured from a running session. Demo dataset throughout: no client name, real place or real figure appears. Deliberately cropped to the results pane. The navigation column is not shown: what a tool produces is the useful thing to publish, while its full module structure is method rather than proof. Cropped, not blurred — a blurred screenshot reads as either a mock-up or as something being hidden badly, and both cost more than the architecture is worth.

Access model

Applied within an engagement. The client keeps the model and documentation so their own team can re-run it after we leave — a model nobody can re-run is a deliverable, not a capability.

Request a demonstration

Tell us the context, timeline and decision you're working toward.

Request a demonstration

We reply within two business days.